The Lockean proviso is a feature of John Locke's labor theory of property which states that whilst individuals have a right to homestead private property from nature by working on it, they can do so only if "there was still enough, and as good left; and more than the yet unprovided could use".John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, Chapter V, paragraph 33.
His proviso is then formulated as follows:
In Georgism, the possession of land is proper only so long as the market rent is paid to the relevant community. If a plot of land has a positive rent, that implies that there is not land of similar quality freely available to others. Locke's proviso has also been used by socialists and universal basic income advocates to point to land acquisition as illegitimate without compensation.
Socialist critics of the proviso, such as G. A. Cohen, point to the issue that the proviso does not take into account previously existing inequalities. Cohen describes the Lockean proviso's first-come-first-served approach as "morally dubious". He uses the example of someone claiming a beach as "their own" and charging admission in exchange for lifeguarding service. This would satisfy the proviso because it does not make anyone's life worse but fails to consider how much better off everyone would be if someone owned the beach and charged only 50 cents for better service. He continues that this superior alternative is never considered under Nozick's proviso.
Karl Widerquist and Grant McCall argue that even weak versions of the proviso, such as the one used by Nozick, are unfulfilled by contemporary societies. The poorest people today, even in wealthy nations, are worse off than they could reasonably expect to be in a stateless hunter-gatherer band that treats the environment as commons that cannot be owned by anyone. They write, "Establishing hunter-gatherer quality-of-life as the baseline for comparison sets an extremely low bar. The tragedy of state societies today is that for all their wealth and achievement they have so consistently failed to surpass that bar."
Thomas Pogge doubts whether "enough, and as good" was available to all in Locke's time: "It is hard to believe that Locke’s claim was true in his time." "In any case", in proposing an alternative global order needed in current times, he argues that "it is surely false on the global plane today".Pogge, T. (2001), Eradicating Systemic Poverty: Brief for a global resources dividend, Journal of Human Development, Volume 2, No. 1, p. 64, accessed on 16 April 2025
|
|